Sunday 7 September 2014

Reader Response (Draft One)


Lu (2013) proposes the recognition of English as Singaporean mother tongue. The surveys conduct by the Ministry of Education reflect a significant growth of Singaporeans speaking mainly English at home and regarding English as their core identity. Singapore experiences linguistic divides due to the conflicting linguistic interests between the young and old generations, as well as the diversified language among the new immigrants. The correlation of Singapore and English has not been substantially recognized by the world despite the fact that fellow students perform better than other nations, including the British, in international tests in aptitude for English.

Singapore is currently in linguistic transition whereby more and more Singaporeans are recognizing English as their de facto mother tongue. As far as I know, some Singaporeans despise their mother tongue as they perceive it as inferior language. I find it ridiculous and hard to believe. They are simply living in their own fairy land world thinking that being very ‘Ang Mo’ appears to be classy. Some claim to have embraced English and western culture totally and yet they cannot even speak proper English. It is also ironic that some fellow Singaporeans are not able to speak a simple sentence in mother tongue.

The linguistic gap between our pioneer and new generations is getting wider. As more children are brought up in English-speaking environment, they are less likely proficient in their mother tongue. This situation has consequently posted a challenge to the interaction between the youngsters and the elderlies who are literate in mother tongue or dialect. I foresee that if we were to designate English as our mother tongue, the younger generation will subsequently lose faith in learning their current mother tongue. This implication will further weaken the intergeneration relationship. Therefore, it is vital to acknowledge our ethnic languages as our mother tongues. It in a sense reminds us of our unique culture and roots, as well as to ties our generation gap.

Most of us would agree that the influx of foreigners in the recent years has an impact to our ecology. However, the impact is not completely negative. I personally see them, mainly the Chinese nationals, as the antidotes to our poisoned local Chinese language. It is similar to the benefit we get when talking to a Caucasian who is a native English speaker.

Singapore is not a native English speaking country and thus, we should not expect the world to certainly recognize for our good command of English. In reality, not all Singaporean can speak fluent and proper English. I believe majority of us are accustomed to the localized form of English particularly known as ‘Singlish’ with negative connotations. Given the unique and vibrant multi-racial society in Singapore, I strongly oppose the idea of having English being recognized as our mother tongue to achieve international acceptance. After all, the Whites will still regard us as Asians no matter how impressive we are in their language

English has long been the core language in our education, administration, commerce and judiciary. Despite the dominance of English in our everyday lives, we must not deny the essentials of our mother tongue. In my opinion, transforming our mother tongue to English literally means converting our race to English. The government and various communities should do more to promote awareness for our mother tongues. We must stand tall with our rich heritage and preserved our mother tongue.



Reference
Lu, L. (2013, July 15). Can English be Singaporean Mother Tongue [Electronic version].

1 comment:

  1. Hi Kai Yao,

    Overall, the reader response is focusing on too many arguments brought up by the author. Need to have a clear thesis statement at the start of the paragraph after your summary and build supporting statements around that statement instead of replying and expressing thoughts about different points raised up in the article. There should also be one clear thesis statement instead of several ones throughout the response.

    A few minor pointer for the summary.
    1. The article says 'According to Ministry of Education figures', so I don't think this is based on just surveys alone, and it shouldn't be assumed to be a survey. I think you might want to write research conducted/ according to the statistics.
    2.'The surveys conduct by the Ministry of Education reflect a significant growth of Singaporeans speaking mainly English at home and regarding English as their core identity.' The surveys had already been conducted, so it should be in past tense, same applies for reflected.
    3. 'as well as the diversified language among the new immigrants.' This is not very accurate. According to the article, 'the new immigrants should adapt to social linguistic practices, with proficiency in English being of utmost importance'. I think there is a need to emphasize 'with proficiency in English being of utmost importance'.
    4. In the last sentence of paragraph 1, you wrote 'recognized' and 'perform'. i think both should be of the same tense.

    Main Body
    1. For paragraph 2, I think 'fairy land world' is too informal.
    2. Paragraph 3, second sentence, 'they are less likely proficient in their mother tongue'. I think 'they are less likely to be proficient in their mother tongue' would make it flow better.
    3. Paragraph 3, 'Therefore, it is vital to acknowledge our ethnic languages as our mother tongues' I think is a thesis statement, so it should be at the start of the paragraph and not appear all the way at the end of the paragraph.
    4. Paragraph 3, last sentence 'as well as to ties our generation gap'. 'ties' ( I think words such as 'narrows' suits the context more)
    5. Paragraph 4, 'Most of us would agree that the influx of foreigners in the recent years has an impact to our ecology'. 'would' and 'has' (verb tense)
    6. Paragraph 4, 'It is similar to the benefit we get' I believe that there will be more than 1 benefit, so it should be in pural form.
    7. Paragraph 5, 'we should not expect the world to certainly recognize (us) for our good command of English'.
    8. Paragraph 5, 'not all Singaporean(s)'

    Referencing not following the APA style. Need to italic title of article, include the date that you retrieved it and the url.

    ReplyDelete