Lu (2013) proposes the recognition of English as Singaporean
mother tongue. The surveys conduct by the Ministry of Education reflect a
significant growth of Singaporeans speaking mainly English at home and regarding
English as their core identity. Singapore
experiences linguistic divides due to the conflicting linguistic interests
between the young and old generations, as well as the diversified language
among the new immigrants. The correlation of Singapore and English has not been
substantially recognized by the world despite the fact that fellow students
perform better than other nations, including the British, in international
tests in aptitude for English.
Singapore is
currently in linguistic transition whereby more and more Singaporeans are recognizing
English as their de facto mother tongue. As far as
I know, some Singaporeans despise their mother tongue as they perceive it as inferior
language. I find it ridiculous and hard to believe. They are simply living in
their own fairy land world thinking that being very ‘Ang Mo’ appears to be
classy. Some claim to have embraced English and western culture totally and yet
they cannot even speak proper English. It is also ironic that some fellow Singaporeans
are not able to speak a simple sentence in mother tongue.
The linguistic gap between our pioneer and new
generations is getting wider. As more children are brought up in English-speaking
environment, they are less likely proficient in their mother tongue. This
situation has consequently posted a challenge to the interaction between the
youngsters and the elderlies who are literate in mother tongue or dialect. I
foresee that if we were to designate English as our mother tongue, the younger
generation will subsequently lose faith in learning their current mother
tongue. This implication will further weaken the intergeneration relationship. Therefore,
it is vital to acknowledge our ethnic languages as our mother tongues. It in a
sense reminds us of our unique culture and roots, as well as to ties our generation
gap.
Most of us would agree that the influx of foreigners
in the recent years has an impact to our ecology. However, the impact is not
completely negative. I personally see them, mainly the Chinese nationals, as
the antidotes to our poisoned local Chinese language. It is similar to the
benefit we get when talking to a Caucasian who is a native English speaker.
Singapore is not a
native English speaking country and thus, we should not expect the world to certainly
recognize for our good command of English. In reality, not all Singaporean can
speak fluent and proper English. I believe majority of us are accustomed to the
localized form of English particularly known as ‘Singlish’ with negative
connotations. Given the unique and vibrant multi-racial society in Singapore, I
strongly oppose the idea of having English being recognized as our mother
tongue to achieve international acceptance. After all, the Whites will still
regard us as Asians no matter how impressive we are in their language
English has long been the core language in our
education, administration, commerce and judiciary. Despite the dominance of
English in our everyday lives, we must not deny the essentials of our mother tongue.
In my opinion, transforming our mother tongue to English
literally means converting our race to English. The government and various
communities should do more to promote awareness for our mother tongues. We must stand tall with our rich heritage and preserved our
mother tongue.
Reference
Lu, L. (2013, July 15). Can English be Singaporean
Mother Tongue [Electronic version].
Hi Kai Yao,
ReplyDeleteOverall, the reader response is focusing on too many arguments brought up by the author. Need to have a clear thesis statement at the start of the paragraph after your summary and build supporting statements around that statement instead of replying and expressing thoughts about different points raised up in the article. There should also be one clear thesis statement instead of several ones throughout the response.
A few minor pointer for the summary.
1. The article says 'According to Ministry of Education figures', so I don't think this is based on just surveys alone, and it shouldn't be assumed to be a survey. I think you might want to write research conducted/ according to the statistics.
2.'The surveys conduct by the Ministry of Education reflect a significant growth of Singaporeans speaking mainly English at home and regarding English as their core identity.' The surveys had already been conducted, so it should be in past tense, same applies for reflected.
3. 'as well as the diversified language among the new immigrants.' This is not very accurate. According to the article, 'the new immigrants should adapt to social linguistic practices, with proficiency in English being of utmost importance'. I think there is a need to emphasize 'with proficiency in English being of utmost importance'.
4. In the last sentence of paragraph 1, you wrote 'recognized' and 'perform'. i think both should be of the same tense.
Main Body
1. For paragraph 2, I think 'fairy land world' is too informal.
2. Paragraph 3, second sentence, 'they are less likely proficient in their mother tongue'. I think 'they are less likely to be proficient in their mother tongue' would make it flow better.
3. Paragraph 3, 'Therefore, it is vital to acknowledge our ethnic languages as our mother tongues' I think is a thesis statement, so it should be at the start of the paragraph and not appear all the way at the end of the paragraph.
4. Paragraph 3, last sentence 'as well as to ties our generation gap'. 'ties' ( I think words such as 'narrows' suits the context more)
5. Paragraph 4, 'Most of us would agree that the influx of foreigners in the recent years has an impact to our ecology'. 'would' and 'has' (verb tense)
6. Paragraph 4, 'It is similar to the benefit we get' I believe that there will be more than 1 benefit, so it should be in pural form.
7. Paragraph 5, 'we should not expect the world to certainly recognize (us) for our good command of English'.
8. Paragraph 5, 'not all Singaporean(s)'
Referencing not following the APA style. Need to italic title of article, include the date that you retrieved it and the url.